Queensland has a court progressive system containing three levels. Every criminal allegation initiate in the Magistrates Court, which thinks about bail, settle straightforward offenses and carries out the more genuine offenses to either the District or Supreme Court. These higher courts additionally have an investigative locale and can resolve both real and condemning debates. The main part of criminal interests anyway are resolved before a board of three to five Supreme Court judges who contain the Court of Appeal.

Judge COURT:

The Magistrates Court is the principal Court in the Queensland Criminal court progression. All lawbreaker and traffic charges are started in this purview. By and large for less genuine issues this procedure will start by either a Notice to Appear or by method for a Complaint and Summons. Progressively genuine accusations will start with a capture and an application for bail.

A Magistrate has the ability to concede bail corresponding to all offenses with the exception of an offense conveying detainment forever, which can’t be relieved or fluctuated under the Criminal Code or some other law or an uncertain sentence under the Penalties and Sentences Act 1992, section 10.

Insights show the Magistrates Court are the busiest Court in the State. In the 2009-2010 money related year the Magistrates Court concluded 170,685 respondents. This looks at to 5,457 respondents settled in Queensland Higher Courts,

The Magistrates Court to a great extent directs synopsis offenses, for example, traffic encroachments, shoplifting, and open irritation matters. In certain occasions the court decides less genuine indictable offenses including theft, attack, misrepresentation and medications.

A Magistrate is a one of a kind legal situation in that they are required to choose both the applicable law and the realities of a contested issue. The Magistrates Court doesn’t have the advantage of a jury to decide the realities of a case.

For increasingly genuine offenses, the Magistrate has the regulatory capacity of deciding if there is adequate proof to put a blamed being investigated in a higher court. Where the Magistrate establishes that there is inadequate proof they have a capacity to excuse the charge. Where in any case, the court discovers that there is a by all appearances case they should submit the charged to either the District or Supreme Court for preliminary.

Region COURT:

The District Court decides progressively genuine indictable charges, for example, assault, furnished theft, extortion and some medication matters. Matters by and large continue to this locale following a regulatory thought by a Magistrate in the lower court. This procedure is known as a Committal Hearing and in certain examples implies that there has just been questioning directed on the arraignment witnesses.

Not at all like the Magistrate Court, where the Police arraign matters, charges in this purview are indicted by the Director of Public Prosecutions. Now and again the DPP has a prudence to introduce an ex officio arraignment to initiate procedures. The Director may do this despite the fact that a Magistrate has recently established that there was deficient proof to submit the charged.

Charges in this locale are initiated when the Director of Public Prosecutions presents an Indictment to the Court.

In the event that an issue continues to a preliminary, at that point the realities will be controlled by a Jury and the law by the Judge. When the jury decides if the Defendant is blameworthy or not liable of an offense their obligation is finished and they play no further job in the procedures. On the off chance that the blamed is seen as liable for the offense the preliminary appointed authority will decide the sentence.

The District Court likewise has a redrafting purview and can hear interests of choices and sentences forced in the Magistrates Court.

Incomparable COURT:

The Supreme Court decides the most genuine indictable charges including murder, homicide and genuine medication charges.

As in the District Court matters continue to this ward from the Magistrates Court, by method for an ex-officio Indictment or Committal Hearing. The Director of Public Prosecutions has carriage of the arraignment of issues in this purview.

Once more, as in the District Court, on the off chance that an issue continues to a preliminary, at that point the realities will be dictated by a Jury and the law by the Judge.

The Supreme Court has a capacity to concede bail according to every single criminal allegation, including those offenses where a Magistrate is limited from thinking about the application. Where a blamed feels oppressed by the choice for a Magistrate or District Court Judge to reject bail, they can have the application re-heard under the watchful eye of a Supreme Court Judge.


The Court of Appeal decides criminal interests from the District and Supreme Courts. The intrigue is a survey of the Courts choice or an intrigue that the sentence forced was either obviously extreme or clearly lacking.

Matters continue to this purview from the District Court or Supreme Court, by method for a Notice of Appeal. Either a blamed individual or by the Director for Public Prosecutions, may bring an intrigue against sentence. Such application should by and large be initiated inside a constrained time allotment, despite the fact that at times an application might be brought, with the leave of the Court, out of time.

The Court of Appeal is included a board of three to five Supreme Court judges, contingent upon the idea of the issues brought up in the notification of bid.

Every one of the courts assumes a significant job in the general procedure. It is basic that those accused of a lawbreaker or traffic offenses have an intense attention to the procedure engaged with every one of the courts and where charges will at last purpose. It is likewise essential to note where privileges of bid lay.

Criminal law is an extraordinary and complex territory of legitimate practice. It requires a comprehension of a heap of applicable laws, court method and a capacity to advocate for the benefit of your customer.

Michael Gatenby built up Gatenby Criminal Lawyers as a boutique criminal law office to give vital portrayal to those accused of criminal or traffic offenses. We comprehend criminal practice, its everything we do.

At the point when your freedom and notoriety is in question, you should request an attorney with the aptitudes and duty to give your intrepid safeguard.